Critical, Hardened Skin, Orb of Lightning/Slow high proc rate bugged?

Chocobo

White-Flower
Reaction score
409
Are those abilities bugged when close to 97% proc rate? (80-97)

http://www.thehelper.net/forums/showthread.php?t=123653


I'd like to have more data on it from other users. Just run the map and try a proc rate on each type of skill. Then post a screenshot.

"-test 1000" (to make a dataset of 1000, not sure if it needs to run twice for -orbs) then...
"-orbs" once all units died...
"-avoid" ...
"-block"...
"-crit"...
use "-remove" when you feel bored of a test (or stop at 1000 if you feel so)

dmgtestj.jpg

dmgtest2.jpg



note: on crit, if you see red numbers apeparing (Critical Strike) and then they stop appearing, it's because warcraft 3 reached the 100 texttags limit.

note 2 : weird that Evasion is not affected by that bug. Perhaps because it does not tend to avoid 1 hit every x attacks, while the other abilities do...
 

TheCrystal

New Member
Reaction score
36
Your note 2 confused me, I thought it was refering to note 1.

Just looked at it.

Obviously Blizzard fucked shit up again with this or something. There's quite literally no reason that I can think of for any of this to bug like that, that or it's the guy who made the system's fault.
 

millzy

Ultra Cool Member
Reaction score
44
i dunno y but iv got alot of units using crit and the text still comes up after 30 mins into the game are u sure that it stops apearing?
 

KileRatZ

Member
Reaction score
4
OP is correct, I actually got to the same conclusion a few months ago with a map of my own, made a few hundred blademasters critting and then checked how high the % chance truly is, here are my findings after 1 million hits per each possible percentage from 30% onward:
- 30% --> 29,12326% (this one was tested with 10M)
- 35% --> 33,5590%
- 40% --> 37,7428%
- 45% --> 41,7995%
- 50% --> 45,6850%
- 55% --> 49,3820%
- 60% --> 52,9197%
- 65% --> 56,3705%
- 70% --> 59,7804%
- 75% --> 63,2070%
- 80% --> 66,6866%
- 85% --> 70,4326%
- 90% --> 74,9626%
- 95% --> 81,3153%
- 100% --> 100%

Edit: this applies to skills based on pulverize, critical strike, bash, cleave, and hardened skin, because those are the skills that use a pseudo random chance system. As far as I know, other % chance abilities like Curse and Evasion do not.
 

Yoshii

New Member
Reaction score
74
hm the chance to crit 100% of the time over 1000 hit at 98% chance is 98/100^1000 basically 1/100,000,000 something is def up
 

KileRatZ

Member
Reaction score
4
Actually that's because warcraft 3 rounds each of these chances to the nearest 5% and then goes on from there (again, doesn't apply for evasion). So for example, your crit will have a same 35% chance whenever you set the chance to 33/34/35/36/37% in the editor.

And since 98% is closer to 100% than it is to 95%, warcraft 3 rounds it to 100%.
 

Sessional

New Member
Reaction score
5
According to killerratz data it's a decently linear increase from 30-95%

.843442 * X + 2.707211 between the values of 30&95

Anyone else have anything? this looks like it could be fun to play with to see the outcome!
 

Samael88

Evil always finds a way
Reaction score
181
If what KillRatz is saying is correct, then a unit with 98%crit should always crit, right?

I want to know where you got that info from, care to share that?
 

Samael88

Evil always finds a way
Reaction score
181
Killratz is correct. It's been described before by Blizzard.

I for one still want to see some link to where blizzard has stated that. I also recall seeing that somewhere, but I still doubt it tho.
It would be a really stupid thing to do if you ask me:nuts:

And also, how are they detecting the crit?
Each time I run a trigger that tries to check how many times a unit is hit based on unit takes damage.
Footman and a peasant.
Normal: 1
Crit:4
The peasant has no armor and no regen.
The first time the footman hits I always get a 0 on my check no matter how I try to correct it. I wonder if that is just me or if it is the test.

I posted the trigger if anyone is wondering how it looks:
Trigger:
  • Detection
    • Events
      • Unit - Peasant 0000 <gen> Takes damage
    • Conditions
    • Actions
      • Set Hits = (Hits + 1)
      • If (All Conditions are True) then do (Then Actions) else do (Else Actions)
        • If - Conditions
          • Hits Equal to 10
        • Then - Actions
          • Unit - Kill Peasant 0000 <gen>
          • Game - Display to (All players) for 30.00 seconds the text: (Hits: + (String(Hits)))
          • Game - Display to (All players) for 30.00 seconds the text: (Crits: + (String(crits)))
        • Else - Actions
      • Set LifeNow = (Life of Peasant 0000 <gen>)
      • Set Check = (CurrentLife - LifeNow)
      • If (All Conditions are True) then do (Then Actions) else do (Else Actions)
        • If - Conditions
          • Check Greater than or equal to 2.00
        • Then - Actions
          • Set crits = (crits + 1)
        • Else - Actions
      • Set CurrentLife = LifeNow
      • Game - Display to (All players) for 30.00 seconds the text: (Check: + (String(Check)))

I know I am a little rusty, but I can't find anything wrong with it, and if the maker of that map has not taken that into consideration, then it is not a correctly done test.

Edit: I just find it odd that blizzard would do such a stupid thing, it would not be the first time they have done something stupid tho.
 

KileRatZ

Member
Reaction score
4
I definitely understand why you want more proof. Personally, I'm not sure but I believe I heard first of the 5% rounding while reading a topic which explains the pseudo random distribution - link: http://forums.dota-allstars.com/index.php?showtopic=245439 (I also just noticed my findings got added in there too, w00t).

After seeing this pseudo randomization trick, I wanted to get real proof by making a testmap myself (and then the inproper chances at higher values were found, kind of by accident). And honestly that's your best bet, make a map yourself and try it! Or run mine / OP's if you trust us :)

Here's the link to mine: http://rapidshare.com/files/274845792/CritExperiment.w3x
 

Chocobo

White-Flower
Reaction score
409
>The first time the footman hits I always get a 0 on my check no matter how I try to correct it. I wonder if that is just me or if it is the test.

note : The unit actually takes damage "after" all your actions there (a timer of 0.00 is needed to actually apply the damage then do something with it - thread search might help for that)

peasant takes dmg.. (10 hp)
LifeNow = 10
Check = 0
display : 0
peasant is hit (9 hp)
peasant takes dmg (9 hp)
LifeNow = 9
Check = 1
display : 1
...

well, use (Damage taken) instead of that "Check".


>this applies to skills based on pulverize, critical strike, bash, cleave, and hardened skin, because those are the skills that use a pseudo random chance system. As far as I know, other % chance abilities like Curse and Evasion do not.

yes.


>If what KillRatz is saying is correct, then a unit with 98%crit should always crit, right?

yes.
actual crit proc rate = round(current proc rate/0.05)/25
 

Legacyspy

New Member
Reaction score
19
Could this be because blizzard uses a system where each time you don't crit, your %chance to crit increases, and each time you do crit it decreases, in order to avoid long runs of crit or no crit?
 

Joccaren

You can change this now in User CP.
Reaction score
54
My critical strike works at any % level 5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,95 and 100% all work for me.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • The Helper The Helper:
    So what it really is me trying to implement some kind of better site navigation not change the whole theme of the site
  • Varine Varine:
    How can you tell the difference between real traffic and indexing or AI generation bots?
  • The Helper The Helper:
    The bots will show up as users online in the forum software but they do not show up in my stats tracking. I am sure there are bots in the stats but the way alot of the bots treat the site do not show up on the stats
  • Varine Varine:
    I want to build a filtration system for my 3d printer, and that shit is so much more complicated than I thought it would be
  • Varine Varine:
    Apparently ABS emits styrene particulates which can be like .2 micrometers, which idk if the VOC detectors I have can even catch that
  • Varine Varine:
    Anyway I need to get some of those sensors and two air pressure sensors installed before an after the filters, which I need to figure out how to calculate the necessary pressure for and I have yet to find anything that tells me how to actually do that, just the cfm ratings
  • Varine Varine:
    And then I have to set up an arduino board to read those sensors, which I also don't know very much about but I have a whole bunch of crash course things for that
  • Varine Varine:
    These sensors are also a lot more than I thought they would be. Like 5 to 10 each, idk why but I assumed they would be like 2 dollars
  • Varine Varine:
    Another issue I'm learning is that a lot of the air quality sensors don't work at very high ambient temperatures. I'm planning on heating this enclosure to like 60C or so, and that's the upper limit of their functionality
  • Varine Varine:
    Although I don't know if I need to actually actively heat it or just let the plate and hotend bring the ambient temp to whatever it will, but even then I need to figure out an exfiltration for hot air. I think I kind of know what to do but it's still fucking confusing
  • The Helper The Helper:
    Maybe you could find some of that information from AC tech - like how they detect freon and such
  • Varine Varine:
    That's mostly what I've been looking at
  • Varine Varine:
    I don't think I'm dealing with quite the same pressures though, at the very least its a significantly smaller system. For the time being I'm just going to put together a quick scrubby box though and hope it works good enough to not make my house toxic
  • Varine Varine:
    I mean I don't use this enough to pose any significant danger I don't think, but I would still rather not be throwing styrene all over the air
  • The Helper The Helper:
    New dessert added to recipes Southern Pecan Praline Cake https://www.thehelper.net/threads/recipe-southern-pecan-praline-cake.193555/
  • The Helper The Helper:
    Another bot invasion 493 members online most of them bots that do not show up on stats
  • Varine Varine:
    I'm looking at a solid 378 guests, but 3 members. Of which two are me and VSNES. The third is unlisted, which makes me think its a ghost.
    +1
  • The Helper The Helper:
    Some members choose invisibility mode
    +1
  • The Helper The Helper:
    I bitch about Xenforo sometimes but it really is full featured you just have to really know what you are doing to get the most out of it.
  • The Helper The Helper:
    It is just not easy to fix styles and customize but it definitely can be done
  • The Helper The Helper:
    I do know this - xenforo dropped the ball by not keeping the vbulletin reputation comments as a feature. The loss of the Reputation comments data when we switched to Xenforo really was the death knell for the site when it came to all the users that left. I know I missed it so much and I got way less interested in the site when that feature was gone and I run the site.
  • Blackveiled Blackveiled:
    People love rep, lol
    +1
  • The Helper The Helper:
    The recipe today is Sloppy Joe Casserole - one of my faves LOL https://www.thehelper.net/threads/sloppy-joe-casserole-with-manwich.193585/

      The Helper Discord

      Members online

      Affiliates

      Hive Workshop NUON Dome World Editor Tutorials

      Network Sponsors

      Apex Steel Pipe - Buys and sells Steel Pipe.
      Top