General PETA kills more than 95 percent of pets in its care

[Sevion]

Once again, you have ignored the question.

I will tell everyone why: FireCat is unable to create a coherent reason that makes any logical sense to dispute anything anyone else brings up against him. <-- He will have no coherent reason and totally ignore this line.

It matters not who destroyed the habitat as that is not the point.

I never said there was anything explicitly wrong about having pets. You are, again, avoiding the main topic. The topic is the justice in eating any kind of animal meat (not including human meat).

If there was a desert with no water, there would be no life (not including bacteria, viruses, or single-celled microorganisms).

No. Any argument you come up with is wrong and I can refute it with little to no effort and I will be right and you will be wrong.

Do not try to take this as a statement of my arrogance and conceit, as I surely have some, because that is not the point of the preceding line. The point of the preceding line is to explicitly point out that you have no argument.

 

[Varine]

He ignores the root of all questions directed at him and circumvents actually having to address the fundamental issue that's being conversed. At this point it's really more of a matter of entertainment than debate. In short, anything he says is unlikely to make sense and can be assumed wrong by principle.

 

[Sevion]

Agree'd. I await Level 2. I'm still in the loading screen waiting for the reply :-/

 

[Varine]

I hear level 2 is intense.

 

[Sevion]

I think I can handle it. But I hear Level 3 is like no other.

 

[The Helper]

I am pretty sure this is still happening, just saying. Hall of Fame!