Nestharus
o-o
- Reaction score
- 84
Actually it'd be Timer.Get, lol
convention on vJASS is like java : o, but I prefer lower case methods anyways ><. c#'s screwy on their method convention ;o.
that's true, but I'm still not going to check for it ; ). I'm not going to be checking for TimerUtils and GroupUtils as they have extra operations.
You are 100% right. The only plausible change I'm considering is adding 2 wrapper functions so kenny is happy if I can find a way to keep code cost at 0 for both of them : ). If code cost is 0 and they don't conflict, then it's extra features at 0 impact
convention on vJASS is like java : o, but I prefer lower case methods anyways ><. c#'s screwy on their method convention ;o.
that's true, but I'm still not going to check for it ; ). I'm not going to be checking for TimerUtils and GroupUtils as they have extra operations.
You are 100% right. The only plausible change I'm considering is adding 2 wrapper functions so kenny is happy if I can find a way to keep code cost at 0 for both of them : ). If code cost is 0 and they don't conflict, then it's extra features at 0 impact
