When looking at the graphics of SCII it doesn't look realistic... It seems more cartoonish kind of graphics, not saying it as in it sucks I'm just saying how they designed it seems more cartoony 3D graphics, not realistic graphics, what do you guys think?
I find that the cartoonish look is not appropriate for a Sci-Fi game.
Samwise is a great concept artist, no doubt about it. Yet the models, and especially the textures look like they obsessively adapted his concept drawings 1:1.
In some games such as Wc3, a mere cartoonish touch works very well, other games like Team Fortress 2 thrive on it, and on others it looks like an indecisive concept. Unfortunately Sc2 counts among the latter. I can only hope they make well use of their time for a graphic overhaul.
I would have to agree that the graphics are more cartoonish then what I would like to see. I would still however them just release the dame game before I die than take the time to do a graphics overall. The game still looks sweet, but I can't say I'm not a little disappointed with some aspects of it.
Because the actual unit models are way more high poly and awesome than wc3 models. (Or at least it achieves the look very well)
I don't know how it is cartoony, maybe from far away but not up close. And I don't think some of the aspects, such as UI and some other stuff are finished yet.
I don't know I just think that it looks really nice in my opinion. =)
I don't think it's too cartoonish and it is a big improvement from warcraft graphics...Definitely the graphics look smoother than wc.... I like the look.
They don't need to change anything as far as im concerned with the visuals...Hell making it "grittier and realistic" will probably make the video cards required for this game really high. Along with memory...
1. Because some people like the cartoonish look (like me)
2. Fantasy Games usually have that cartoon look while modern day games have that RL look. (even if its a Science Fiction Game its still somewhat a fantasy)
3. To make sure people with older computers can still handle the game and won't have to get a new computer to play the game
Most of them don't look really very cartoony to me. Theres a few units from all races, mostly zerg, that look cartoony, but im sure plenty of things will change before the game comes out, graphics being one of them...
I find that especially the terran buildings look too wobbly-bobbly roundish to be terran, especially the Command Center. A good design for the terran command center was presented with the original starcraft in one of the map loading screens. Terran buildings need distinct edges to obtain the typical terran look as established in the original Starcraft; right now they look more like molded of clay. In other places it's mainly the textures that do need a touch of realism.
I also had high expectations on the overall graphics, which should reproduce a far more dark and gloomy mood, which would then be lightened up by stark floodlights, flashes of firing rounds or the bright bluish light of archons floating by. Yet it looks like units do neither emit light nor are they much affected by light, which I find very poor for a game that stands on the brink to directX10.
Imagine a movie like "Aliens" or "Starship Troopers" with the visual concept of "The Wizzard of Oz" - that's where Blizzard is currently heading with the graphics of Starcraft 2.
Eh not quite like C&C 3 lol, EA focused half the agme to be on graphics, take out most of the shiny glossyness and alot of the special effects then sure. But then it would lose its feel HIgh graphics should honestly be for FPS
Signatures can be edit in your account profile. As for the old stuffs, I'm thinking it's because Blizzard is now under Microsoft, and because of Microsoft Xbox going the way it is, it's dreadful.
@tom_mai78101 I must be blind. If I go on my profile I don't see any area to edit the signature; If I go to account details (settings) I don't see any signature area either.
You can get there if you click the bell icon (alerts) and choose preferences from the bottom, signature will be in the menu on the left there https://www.thehelper.net/account/preferences
I bought an Ender 3 during the pandemic and tinkered with it all the time. Just bought a Sovol, not as easy. I'm trying to make it use a different nozzle because I have a fuck ton of Volcanos, and they use what is basically a modified volcano that is just a smidge longer, and almost every part on this thing needs to be redone to make it work
So, 2.5mm longer. But the thing that measures the bed is about 1.5mm above the nozzle, so if I swap it with a volcano then I'm 1mm behind it. So cool, new bracket to swap that, but THEN the fan shroud to direct air at the part is ALSO going to be .5mm to low, and so I need to redo that, but by doing that it is a little bit off where it should be blowing and it's throwing it at the heating block instead of the part, and fuck man
I didn't realize they designed this entire thing to NOT be modded. I would have just got a fucking Bambu if I knew that, the whole point was I could fuck with this. And no one else makes shit for Sovol so I have to go through them, and they have... interesting pricing models. So I have a new extruder altogether that I'm taking apart and going to just design a whole new one to use my nozzles. Dumb design.
Can't just buy a new heatblock, you need to get a whole hotend - so block, heater cartridge, thermistor, heatbreak, and nozzle. And they put this fucking paste in there so I can't take the thermistor or cartridge out with any ease, that's 30 dollars. Or you can get the whole extrudor with the direct driver AND that heatblock for like 50, but you still can't get any of it to come apart