System Advanced Indexing & Data Storage

[Gwypaas]

Just make some system that recycles units instead of index´s and it would be awesome.

Here: http://www.wc3c.net/showthread.php?t=101600

 

[Romek]

I still prefer my indexing system.

Anyway, I'm sure you know what I think of this.
What I like, what I don't like, and what I hate.

 

[Jesus4Lyf]

Here: http://www.wc3c.net/showthread.php?t=101600

Ew! Look how much stuff it calls compared to CreateUnit! :thup:

>I still prefer my indexing system.
*Nods*
Not much point arguing it here. This -does- do everything yours does, right? After all, you did learn how to write yours based on my unreleased code, ey?

 

[Romek]

> After all, you did learn how to write yours based on my unreleased code, ey?
Not quite. Except the recycling. I wanted to see how that was done. (Though I could've just look at PUI).

 

[WolfieeifloW]

Wasn't it Azlier who originally made up the acronym "AIDS" ?

EDIT: I just remember Azlier was going to use "AIDS" for "IDEA" originally .

 

[Jesus4Lyf]

I heard so, but Larcenist suggested it to me. Azlier hasn't used AIDS I'm pretty sure, but either way, the actual acronym words suited nicely in the end, after some tinkering.

 

[Renendaru]

This is a really helpful system, I'm already using it for two systems in my map.

 

[Kenny]

AIDS Structs are just an awesome idea. Very useful for all types of systems. This also seems to be more efficient than PUI *winks*, as far as I have seen/heard.

If i ever have a need for unit indexing, I will definately give my map AIDS.

Good work.

 

[Romek]

Approved.

 

[Jesus4Lyf]

Woot! :thup:

TH has AIDS.
Except it's powerful system, not a virus.

 

[kingkingyyk3]

not a virus.

I lol'ed.

 

[Steel]

I suggest your hardcap the number of units you can index for safety purposes. If you have to cycle through over 8,000 units you will reach the limit operation given your functions.

 

[Jesus4Lyf]

I suggest your hardcap the number of units you can index for safety purposes. If you have to cycle through over 8,000 units you will reach the limit operation given your functions.

I fail to see how you could hit op limit, considering none of my functions cycle through all the units. Each function call is O(1) complexity. :thup:

Please explain in better detail?

(Hmm. I could debug message the 8191 thing. That's about it.)

 

[kingkingyyk3]

A map with 1000 units is unplayable, actually.. You will suffer low fps in this status.

 

[Jesus4Lyf]

Wrong. Jack it to 1000, works fine, apparently. <_<

 

[kingkingyyk3]

His 1 is mac. lol. You should think about whole pc in the world, not only one.

 

[Jesus4Lyf]

What are you talking about?

I run a ~3 year old laptop with 1.8 Ghz Centrino. A mac should SURELY be faster than that? :banghead:

Besides, that's with 1000 units all being processed 32 times a second. If that runs... gosh, anything should run...? lol

 

[Romek]

> A map with 1000 units is unplayable, actually.. You will suffer low fps in this status.
Nice of you test stuff.
This is complete BS.

A map could probably have 9k dummy units without a drop in FPS.

 

[Jesus4Lyf]

A map could probably have 9k dummy units without a drop in FPS.

Yep, that would be my bet. Especially if they're hidden with ShowUnit(unit,false).

 

[kingkingyyk3]

I tried to spawn 1000 footman and my pc laggy.