Report Study links tattoos to disorder

The Helper

Necromancy Power over 9000
Staff member
Reaction score
1,703
The presence of tattoos on forensic psychiatric inpatients should alert clinicians to a possible diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), and also about the potential for histories of suicide attempt, substance abuse, and sexual abuse, according to research published today in Personality and Mental Health.

ASPD is a mental disorder characterised by several psychological and behavioural phenomena, including a lack of empathy and remorse, a low tolerance for anxiety, and shallowness. People with ASPD prefer action to thought, and pathological lying, cheating, stealing, physical aggression and drug abuse are not uncommon. To be diagnosed with ASPD, the individual must have developed this behaviour before the age of 15, and as such is qualitatively different from the idea of a scheming, dishonest business person or politician, unless the behaviour began earlier in life.

For this research, 36 male inpatients of a maximum-security state forensic psychiatric facility were studied by psychiatrists from the Michigan Center for Forensic Psychiatry (CFP). Around half of the subjects had been admitted because they were found to be unfit to stand trial and the other half had been found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Of the patients studied, 15 had tattoos and 17 were diagnosed as having ASPD. Of those with tattoos, 11 of 15, or 73%, had ASPD, whereas only 6 of 21, or 29%, of those without tattoos had the same diagnosis. The research also uncovered an increased likelihood for those with tattoos to have previously suffered from sexual abuse, abused substances or to have attempted suicide.

Read the rest of the article here.
 

EatShrooms

You can change this now in User CP.
Reaction score
44
had been found not guilty by reason of insanity.

So who decides that these psychiatrists are helping those people by declaring them insane?

Totally idiotic imo. Human beings aren't statistics.

Possibly. You can always force statistics too, like this study. Maybe to do it right you should deal with the individual rather than looking at a group of people.
 

Darthfett

Aerospace/Cybersecurity Software Engineer
Reaction score
615
Wow, this study is retarded. It's trying to link people with tattoos to someone being insane, or very antisocial..

However, their 'statistics' were taken from a maximum security prison.

Now how does that work? Just because a lot of insane people get tattoos does not mean that a lot of people with tattoos are insane.

This study fails.

They should have studied tons of people that have tattoos, from the public, not 36 from a maximum security prison.
 

BlargIAmDead

New Member
Reaction score
25
It doesn't seem like Dr. Cardasis is claiming this can be used to conclude anything about anyone, except people who are already in maximum-security asylums. Presumably to figure out exactly which illness is responsible for their getting put into maximum-security asylums...though I would think that by the time matters get that bad, you've already got a psychiatric case history the size of a phonebook. Any history of personality disorders, addictions, etc. should already be well documented.

But I agree that 36 data points is a very poor sample size.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.

      The Helper Discord

      Members online

      Affiliates

      Hive Workshop NUON Dome World Editor Tutorials

      Network Sponsors

      Apex Steel Pipe - Buys and sells Steel Pipe.
      Top