- Reaction score
- 1,708
Yeah! They may refuse to move, but that's no reason to abuse them.This is horrible and I cant think of a reason that would allow such behavior.
Isn't that... exactly the reason?Yeah! They may refuse to move, but that's no reason to abuse them.
They're ironically effectively a corporation trying to influence politics themselves. That aside, they appear to be a bunch of people jealous of the rich. Their demands sound like communism. Fast forward to the hypothetical future where they succeed in bringing their demands, and the students are protesting in favour of liberalising the economic system again.according to Bloomberg Businessweek, protesters want more and better jobs, more equal distribution of income, bank reform, and a reduction of the influence of corporations on politics.
It sucks but they do ask them to move first...
Wall Street has a bunch of jewellery shops and cafes on it.Occupy Wall Street made some sense. Occupy the street where all the crap is going down and let them know the people are watching, I get that.
Occupy Wall Street made some sense. Occupy the street where all the crap is going down and let them know the people are watching, I get that.
But "occupying" random parks and staying overnight? What's the point!? Even on Wall Street they should go home at night because there's nobody to see them.
Maybe it is. But why the hell spraying people? You see they aren't even violent!Isn't that... exactly the reason?
FireCat, I, too, thought that way.Seriously, as long as they’re peaceful, So let the Occupiers stay!
Why would you have to move from a public space that you pay tuition and taxes to fund?
This isn't torture but waterboarding is...