Reversing a singly linked list

jonas

Well-Known Member
Code:
rec_reverse(last_of_rev,to_rev) = if to_rev != nil:
  next_rev = to_rev.next;
  to_rev.next = last_of_rev;
  rec_reverse(to_rev,next_rev)

reverse(to_rev) = rec_reverse(nil, to_rev)
Code:
reversed list    list to be reversed
(|<-()<-...<-()  ,  []->()->...->()->|)
after one recurisve step becomes:
(|<-()<-...<-()<-[]  ,  ()->...->()->|)
at the end of recursion becomes:
(|<-()<-...<-()<-[]<-()<-...<-()  ,  |)
 
Last edited:

Accname

2D-Graphics enthusiast
How about this?
Code:
    public void reverse() {
       Node prev = null;
       Node current = first;
       while (current != null) {
         Node next = current.next;
         current.next = prev;
         prev = current;
         current = next;
       }
       first = prev;
     }
This is using a simple while-loop.
Here a full example with test case:
Code:
  public static void main(final String[] args) {
     LList l = new LList();
     l.first = new Node("A");
     l.first.next = new Node("B");
     l.first.next.next = new Node("C");
     l.first.next.next.next = new Node("D");
     l.first.next.next.next.next = new Node("E");
     l.first.next.next.next.next.next = new Node("F");
    
     System.out.println(l);
     System.out.println();
     l.reverse();
     System.out.println(l);
     System.out.println();
   }
  
   public static class LList {
     Node first;
    
     public void reverse() {
       Node prev = null;
       Node current = first;
       while (current != null) {
         Node next = current.next;
         current.next = prev;
         prev = current;
         current = next;
       }
       first = prev;
     }
    
     @Override
     public String toString() {
       StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
       Node current = first;
       while (current != null) {
         sb.append(current.value);
         sb.append(" ");
         current = current.next;
       }
       return sb.toString();
     }
   }
  
   static class Node {
     Object value;
     Node next;
    
     public Node(Object value) {
       this.value = value;
     }
    
   }
Output:
A B C D E F

F E D C B A
 

Accname

2D-Graphics enthusiast
Its not quite the same depending on the execution enviroment and language you are using. A loop is much better in java than recursion. Sure, at some point the JIT will jump in and might improve the recursive method, but until then the loop will outperform the recursion every time.
 

jonas

Well-Known Member
Its not quite the same depending on the execution enviroment and language you are using. A loop is much better in java than recursion. Sure, at some point the JIT will jump in and might improve the recursive method, but until then the loop will outperform the recursion every time.
Note that I was not giving a java program... At the conceptual level the two are identical, and that was the level in which I was giving the algorithm. Yes, in a given actual implementation the performance between the two may differ significantly, and one of them may run out of memory while the other may not (this is actually the bigger issue). From my point of view, you have simply given the idiomatic Java implementation of the conceptual algorithm above. Maybe we can find common ground here?
 

Accname

2D-Graphics enthusiast
You have to go to a veeeeerrrryyy high conceptual level to call these two implementations equal. Sure, in the end they do the same thing because thats what they are supposed to do. But both use different syntactic and semantic constructs some of which may or may not be available in a given language / runtime enviroment.
 

jonas

Well-Known Member
You have to go to a veeeeerrrryyy high conceptual level to call these two implementations equal. Sure, in the end they do the same thing because thats what they are supposed to do. But both use different syntactic and semantic constructs some of which may or may not be available in a given language / runtime enviroment.
The first one is not an implementation, it's a description of the algorithm. There might not even be a compiler or interpreter for that language.
I wouldn't just say that they do the same thing, I'd go as far to say they do it the *same way*, namely by going through the pointers and flipping them one by one. Recursion and iteration just say "repeatedly do this", or "repeatedly do this until".
 

Accname

2D-Graphics enthusiast
Thats a little to vague for my taste. A loop is an actual syntactical structure defined by a language. Recursion is a method of software-developement that can be used in most languages but there is no syntactical component to it in any language I know of. There are many different languages, some of which do not have loops. Some of them do not have the concept of methods either but they have loops. Some have methods but do not allow for recursion, etc.
I can not say with a straight face that these two things are "the same". They might be very similar, they might be exchangeable in most enviroments, but they are not "the same".
 

jonas

Well-Known Member
Well, I understand that you live in the practical world of building real software, where there are very clearly specific definitions and precise differences for these definitions. If I would develop a Java program, I would use a while loop, not a recursive method call, just like you have.

I on the other hand live in the theoretical world of building language models and proving that can be compiled correctly to run on real machines, so I'm looking more at the conceptual level of what languages can do (in general) and how it would be compiled and run, and so in my world they use the same mechanisms and I don't distinguish between them. Whether a language implements "doing the same thing over and over" by function recursion or loop recursion or a recursion operator (like system T) is completely irrelevant to me; if it has a way of "doing the same thing over and over", it needs to do a) b) and c) to compile correctly for x86.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • The Helper The Helper:
    Have been talking to a childhood friend who is an Artist and is interested in doing some game music. He has a studio in his house. Yes!
  • The Helper The Helper:
    Going to try and get my friend into the homebrew game indie market he is real interested
  • Varine Varine:
    Does reforged require the port forwarding? Is that even still a thing?
  • The Helper The Helper:
    I do not think that is a thing anymore
  • The Helper The Helper:
    Battle.net is different now and I do not think they are using the same network code
  • The Helper The Helper:
    I am sure they are not
  • tom_mai78101 tom_mai78101:
    Lately, news aren't as enticing as they seemed. Or maybe I'm getting old and desensitized.
  • jonas jonas:
    I think news are more serious recently
  • tom_mai78101 tom_mai78101:
    More serious doesn't necessarily mean it's more interesting. :(
  • The Helper The Helper:
    I find that news.google.com has lots of interesting science stuff going on and the Space X stuff with Starship is super cool too
  • The Helper The Helper:
    plus the boring company and physics stuff happening now but I am more into the science now but there is still some crazy news I see out there using Reddit as a news source though and aggregate services like news.google and stuff and put AP in there I always read the news and yes sometimes it is not as interesting as others
  • The Helper The Helper:
    At some point I am going to look at Xenforo and see if it integrates with Hubspot at all. Would love to look at forum under a full marketing account in Hubspot since I have access to that stuff with my current gig
  • Ghan Ghan:
    Kind of surprised it wouldn't have its own forum product offering.
  • Ghan Ghan:
    That said, when Blizzard switched forum software, they went with Discourse, not xenForo.
  • jonas jonas:
    I think news.google shows you personalized news
  • midnight8 midnight8:
    any of the peeps in here run youtube channels? Figure of all the peeps in this forum, got to be some other geeks like me with channels
  • Ghan Ghan:
    I can say I've uploaded a YouTube video.
    +1
  • The Helper The Helper:
    I can say I know someone that uploaded a youtube video :)
  • jonas jonas:
    A friend of mine has a channel where he uploads some of the crazy machines he has built. Like when he plugged an electric motor into a 3d printed gearbox, attached it to his bycicle and then drove 50mph with it.
  • The Helper The Helper:
    You should post a link to his channel in General Discussion I would definitely check it out

    Members online

    No members online now.

    Affiliates

    Hive Workshop NUON Dome
    Top