Zakyath
Member
- Reaction score
- 238
cause = the what. we know the what. spontaneous human combustion is the what. the why is what we are unsure of.
Read the article, we don't know that.
cause = the what. we know the what. spontaneous human combustion is the what. the why is what we are unsure of.
The fire had been confined to the sitting room. The only damage was to the body, which was totally burnt, the ceiling above him and the floor underneath him.
The court was told that no trace of an accelerant had been found and there had been nothing to suggest foul play.
"This fire was thoroughly investigated and I'm left with the conclusion that this fits into the category of spontaneous human combustion, for which there is no adequate explanation," he said.
Read the second part where the scientist says he doesn't want to call this a spontaneous combustion
Read the part where they call it spontaneous combustion anyway?
If I say it was caused by terrorist penguins, that doesn't make it so. There's a lack of evidence, and sure, you can make guesses from that, but you can't draw conclusions.
Theres a terrorist attack. Every piece of evidence points the the fact that penguins pulled off the act. However even after a total of 200 terrorist attacks carried out by penguins in the past 300 years we are still unsure of how penguins are capable of carrying out such actions.
^what this is more like, using ur example.
Hahaha :thup:If I say it was caused by terrorist penguins, that doesn't make it so. There's a lack of evidence, and sure, you can make guesses from that, but you can't draw conclusions.
No, we have circumstances, not evidence.