System Abct

[soulreaping]

Ok one other thing, related to TT.

I read PandaMine's thread on his HSAS system and it was said to be faster than ABC.

My question is: is TT faster than HSAS when it comes to high frequency timers (i.e. 0.03 periodic)?

 

[cr4xzZz]

> is TT faster than HSAS when it comes to high frequency timers (i.e. 0.03 periodic)?
Umm, did you read the TT documentation? Cohadar said there that TT is the fastest attaching system for high frequency timers. Besides, TT is independant to ABC (different systems) so TT > HSAS > ABC when it comes to speed.
Correct me if I'm mistaking.

 

[0zaru]

But then we became to this, in some post Cohadar sayed that Pandamine HSAS wasn't good at all...

Anyway For attaching to triggers we will have to use ABC, right?

 

[cr4xzZz]

> Anyway For attaching to triggers we will have to use ABC, right?

Yeah, ABCT is only for timers. Ops, started answering as if I'm Cohadar. Sry, I'll get away asap

 

[Cohadar]

So far cr4xzZz was correct in his answers.

Please don't start system wars here, thank you.

 

[Joker(Div)]

They have the same speed and ABCT is easier so I guess there is none...

So ABCT is just a more user-friendly version of ABC?

 

[Cohadar]

So ABCT is just a more user-friendly version of ABC?

Yes but: ABC is for timers, triggers and dialogs,
ABCT is only for timers.

So ABCT is a user-friendly version of 1/3 of ABC

 

[GoGo-Boy]

I got to say this is really, really easy to use. I didn't understand it first, but when I saw your slide example I understood and I got to agree to this " It does indeed a lot of dirty work for you" ;O
(btw, I'm quite new too attaching and timers, but hell, it didn't took me long to get this ^_^)

 

[Cohadar]

Version 2.0

Faster and 100% compatible with the old version.
To upgrade simply replace the trigger text.

 

[cr4xzZz]

Neat... Faster you say. But it's still less faster than TT, right? ^^
I suppose there are no other upgrades instead of speed?

> so it ensures fastest possible data retrieval witch is most important

Isn't this which ?

 

[Cohadar]

Neat... Faster you say. But it's still less faster than TT, right? ^^
I suppose there are no other upgrades instead of speed?

> so it ensures fastest possible data retrieval witch is most important

Isn't this which ?

Well it has better memory management but it is not that important as speed.

It is not my fault SFilip was too lazy to include spell checker in TESH

 

[emjlr3]

why is this not approved, any objections?

 

[soulreaping]

Question:
Has an attempt to combine ABCT and TT been made?

Is it possible?

 

[emjlr3]

already been stated that it is possible, if you like bugs, or so Cohadar seems to think...

 

[soulreaping]

What bugs are to become if such a system executes?

 

[Tinki3]

> why is this not approved, any objections?

None from me, I think the system is great personally.

 

[Cohadar]

Question:
Has an attempt to combine ABCT and TT been made?

Is it possible?

I don't understand this question?

If you meant is it possible to use them in same map at the same time than yes it possible (pyramidal defence)

If you meant is it possible to call ABCT_Start to load data and than use TT_GetData to get data - that is stupid and will not work
(same for TT_Start and using ABCT_GetData)

If you meant creating a system that has all good properties of both TT and ABCT I already answered it here.

 

[Joker(Div)]

How much slower is ABCT compared to TT when running at high Frequecies? ( < .1 )

 

[Cohadar]

It isn't slower.

But 10 TT functions sthat run at the same time are faster than 10 ABCT functions working at the same time.

TT has a way of "stacking" calls that run at the same time.

 

[~GaLs~]

Well, Cohadar, I don't get how does the ABCT_Zero works...

What current thread is completed?