New_U.S.
ITS OVER 9000!
- Reaction score
- 125
I believe you should be able to. No civilian needs an automatic assault rifle, and there are laws to prevent military grade weapons from being sold/owned. The system is fine as is.
Lies. Nobody steals without reason, even kleptomaniacs have to start somewhere.there will always be theft. no matter how prosporous something is.
During government class we got off track and started to talk about gun rights, since i go to a private school, all of us agreed on one thing.
Guns dont kill people. People kill people
Ok.. down to the point
The right to bear arms was in the original bill of rights. I havnt done too much research, but all i know is. It is not bad to not bear arms. (I think its Biden thats against right to bear arms?) I dont know whats bad about it, you use it for self-defense
As stated by wikipedia.
In the United States, the right to keep and bear arms is often presented in the context of military service and the broader right of self defense.
In other words, if you use it for self-defense, you might get sent to jail, its a controversial aspect of it, whether or not it is for self-defense. Its stated that you can retaliate only if you are attacked first. Even in self-defense you cant kill them, which would probably be the case if you used a gun.
In Virginia, its legal to carry in public, as long as its clearly visible and you are 18, which is good since without a gun you cant fight a guy with a gun. (of course, you can use a samurai sword). Which is the context of "right to bear arms" its the right to bear any kind of weapon
The needs of humans are unlimited.
That's just ridiculous. Those guns you keep for "rebeling" will just cause more accidents and deaths. Keep in mind that the constitution was written long ago. Things were different then.What about the need to rebel in case the government becomes a little too tyrannical? That's also one of the reasons in the U.S. Constitution.
Then the military would more then likely mutiny. Generally people don't like having their freedom stepped on and it would trigger a civil war.>the same time they say no one would be able to protect the USA should some evil country invade us.
What about the need to rebel in case the government becomes a little too tyrannical? That's also one of the reasons in the U.S. Constitution.
there will always be theft. no matter how prosporous something is.
>the same time they say no one would be able to protect the USA should some evil country invade us.
What about the need to rebel in case the government becomes a little too tyrannical? That's also one of the reasons in the U.S. Constitution.
>The needs of humans are unlimited.
Nonsense. Human wants, however...
Do I know you? That's what my business education teacher said a few days ago.
Of course. But the rate at which it happens is most certainly related to a standard of living. Someone who makes 60k isn't going to attempt armed robbery.
I am for gun rights, like a lot of other people say, but not "my bazooka!"
Guns require responsibility, and care, without those, accidents or others happen.
Guns are lame, I would rather have a maul.