Iwan_Krissov
New Member
- Reaction score
- 18
It's wrong because it's not the question that has been asked (read thread, we are talking about Range Motion Buffer, not chance on missing).
>now it is at I believe to be a stable 128.
64 not stable? It should be. If the target doesn't move, a range motion buffer of 10 is able to hit it.
You started the discussion. Read my first post in this thread, read it properly and than think again if I were talking about range motion buffer or not. You were talking about missing moving targets, which is quite different and has nothing to do with range motion buffer...