DataSystem

[grim001]

CS_Cashe is using string for storing data if I remember it correctly witch means he has to do similar hashing routine like my system

I think you are confused

so it does not really matter if it uses native functions
they are approximately the same.

Wrong, native functions are (usually) extremely fast, non-native functions are extremely slow.

So after all this nonsense we can finally conclude that
I am not dumb, and that I was actually correct in my first post.

Still dumb, still wrong.

 

[Cohadar]

he he have it your way I give up.

 

[--Thanatos--]

Alright now, for SFilip: I don't make leaks, just see the maps they attach, also did the same, raising by a number. Well, I was wrong for this: it increase by hundreds sometimes. But usually by 1-5. But I spam and reach the end within minutes.

But well, for now going to make the limit go out of 100. (Hard Work. . . .indeed...)

 

[Cohadar]

Or you can save yourself some trouble
and use my Ultra-Giga-Mega-Superb attachment system. :shades:

God I am so lame :banghead:

 

[--Thanatos--]

So I think I'll use HandleVars Struct...

struct freak
    unit c
endstruct

function zz takes nothing returns nothing
 local timer x = GetExpiredTimer()
 local freak z = GetHandleInt(x,"data")
...
endfunction

function zzz takes nothing returns nothing
 local freak z = freak.create()
 local timer x = CreateTimer()
    set z.c = GetTriggerUnit()
    call SetHandleInt(x,"data",z)
    call TimerStart (x,0.04,true,function zz)
endfunction

 

[Cohadar]

Good choice,

But if you are using struct to timer attachment only
and it seems you do
my system works equally fine.

That's what I am using it for, and it has been completely tested in that area.