-rep message?

[elmstfreddie]

After -repping someone it says the same message as +repping, which is along the lines as May you receive the same in return. And I've always thought, why would I want -rep in return?

 

[DM Cross]

I don't know if we can fix that... But we've noticed it and it has been commented on before We're aware.

 

[elmstfreddie]

But we've noticed it and it has been commented on before We're aware.

Ah okay sorry, I don't spend much of my time in this part of the forums
Didn't realize it was mentioned before (but I hoped it kinda was lol)

 

[AceHart]

> I've always thought, why would I want -rep in return?

That's precisely the point.
Besides, don't fix what isn't broken.

 

[MeRcChRiS]

Maybe I should try it on someone to see if hes telling the truth.. =D

 

[Akatsuki]

> I've always thought, why would I want -rep in return?

That's precisely the point.
Besides, don't fix what isn't broken.

Yeah I kind of agree. It really makes you rethink before you -rep someone. So you would only -rep if that person actually deserved it. I read somewhere the someone would delete useless -rep every once in awhile. Not sure if this is true but I read it or dreamed I read it. So if the person who pointlessly -rep someone might get -rep themselves. While if it was a pointless -rep then it would just get reversed.

 

[SFilip]

> makes you rethink before you -rep someone
Too bad the actual message appears after you give out -rep...

> someone would delete useless -rep every once in awhile
Possibly TH sometimes looks through people's rep and removed the ones that are made on random posts.

 

[New_U.S.]

maybe someone wants red boxes instead of green =O

 

[SilverHawk]

maybe someone wants red boxes instead of green =O

Someone does. He doesn't post much here anymore though.

 

[Akatsuki]

I wouldn't mind havng having negative of what SilverHawk has. But I don't want to cause trouble around to get that much -rep.

 

[w/e]

You'd be banned far before you got there.
As I recall, one of the messages for ryoko's rep was "SD_Ryoko, only god has kept you from being banned."

 

[SilverHawk]

You'd be banned far before you got there.
As I recall, one of the messages for ryoko's rep was "SD_Ryoko, only god has kept you from being banned."

There's one more:

(Name) <-- BANNED

 

[The Helper]

People get banned way before that

 

[SilverHawk]

Yeah, I don't really know why we have any below -50; however, it makes for a good laugh.

 

[Tonks]

Yeah, I don't really know why we have any below -50; however, it makes for a good laugh.

So that admins can look cool.

 

[elmstfreddie]

> I've always thought, why would I want -rep in return?

That's precisely the point.
Besides, don't fix what isn't broken.

It still doesn't sound right no matter how you think about it... It's always, may you get -rep too!!!

 

[Doom-Angel]

It still doesn't sound right no matter how you think about it... It's always, may you get -rep too!!!

well most of the times i -repped i got back unless he couldn't rep me back so it's kinda true messege....

 

[DM Cross]

It still doesn't sound right no matter how you think about it... It's always, may you get -rep too!!!

Could be worse.

We could reset rep all across the board. People with near 1000's of rep suddenly have nothing and are no better and no worse than someone who just signed up.

Total equality.

Then again, isn't that what communism was about?

 

[Miz]

Yep...

Any many people think I am not worried about rep as long as my rep doesn't go below 100

 

[Tonks]

Then again, isn't that what communism was about?

Maybe they were headed in the right direction, albeit, with a few wrong turns.