It's Here!!!!

[Prometheus]

Yeah, it isn't. Lacks far too much.

 

[PureOwnage]

I've been spending over 1 hour creating a 10x20 grid with a region in each squarebox in the grid. Over 100 regions/variables.

 

[Carnerox]

Ima going to go Pre-order SC2 tomorrow i want that damn beta key.

 

[ElderKingpin]

i wish i could play :[ my comp cant handle SC2

 

[YourFace]

i wish i could play :[ my comp cant handle SC2

I have an i7 core 3.2 Amd processor, and I still lag on 2 vs 2 maps on high settings. SC2's graphics takes godly computers to full experience the game.

 

[Sevion]

I have an i7 core 3.2 Amd processor, and I still lag on 2 vs 2 maps on high settings. SC2's graphics takes godly computers to full experience the game.

Seriously? The only time I got lag was when I had max food hydras, Cleeezzz had max food colossus and zealots, enemy had max food carriers (both) and all three had moships. That was the ONLY time I got lag that was from me. o_o'

I have a Core i7 920 with 6GB ram with an ATI 4890 1GB HD.

 

[tom_mai78101]

Seriously? The only time I got lag was when I had max food hydras, Cleeezzz had max food colossus and zealots, enemy had max food carriers (both) and all three had moships. That was the ONLY time I got lag that was from me. o_o'

I have a Core i7 920 with 6GB ram with an ATI 4890 1GB HD.

That means you need to practice more on your strategic executions.

Too many units == You're not able to defeat your opponent.

 

[Sevion]

That means you need to practice more on your strategic executions.

Too many units == You're not able to defeat your opponent.

That's not the point I'm trying to make -_-'

 

[PureOwnage]

Rofl. You want to try playing with 4GB Ram, Pentium 4 Single Core Processor (Made in 2001) and a GeForce9800 GT?

Let's see my combo in Action:
Team Fortress 2 (everything low, 2x AA) : 40 FPS, 10-20FPS in a firefight
Warcraft 3: 60 FPS, 30FPS with all healthbars turned on.
Starcraft 2(everything low except texture and post processing) : 20 FPS all around.

 

[Renendaru]

o.o I'm running at all high at about 60 fps static, even in high-intense battles.

 

[sqrage]

I'm running everything maxed and I lagged when the other dudes had a mothership and like 7 carriers with a bunch of Zerg units there too.

 

[Romek]

> SC2's graphics takes godly computers to full experience the game.
Like Sevion, I've got a 4890 and an i7 920 CPU. I was recommended all Ultra settings, and I haven't had a drop of lag, ever.

 

[Slapshot136]

I have an i7 core 3.2 Amd processor, and I still lag on 2 vs 2 maps on high settings. SC2's graphics takes godly computers to full experience the game.

I wonder what your graphics card is - and I never knew Amd made i7 processors

my laptop runs SC2 on maxed settings just fine (and I play 2v2's and like to mass carriers)...

specs:
intel 2.26 ghz p8400 CPU
nvidia 9800 gt mobile
4gb 1066 (ddr3) ram
1920 x 1200 res screen

 

[tom_mai78101]

I think he meant Intel.

 

[Prometheus]

I'm running SC2 on max setting on 7 Ultimate 32 bit, got a 4850, a dual 2.6ghz and 4 gigs of ram. AMD processor. No lag.

 

[BlowingKush]

BFG GTX-280 = GG


it's all about the video card baby,
its all about the video card.

 

[sqrage]

I'm running SC2 on max setting on 7 Ultimate 32 bit, got a 4850, a dual 2.6ghz and 4 gigs of ram. AMD processor. No lag.

I think you'd lag with what I posted up there.

On another note, this is officially the "who has what specs and does or doesn't lag under certain demanding circumstances" thread.