World Russians to deploy floating nuclear power plant

The Helper

Necromancy Power over 9000
Staff member
Reaction score
1,697
(Phys.org) —The general director of one of Russia's largest shipbuilders, Aleksandr Voznesensky, has announced to reporters that a floating nuclear power plant is currently under construction at one of Russia's ship yards. He added that it will likely be ready for use by 2016. The Russians are calling it a "floating power" station, abbreviated to PEB. The vessel has been given the name Akademik Lomonosov.

Several countries, including the United States and China have considered building floating nuclear power plants but until now, no other known vessels have reached the construction phase. The advantages of a floating nuclear power station are obvious—electrical power could be brought to areas that are not currently being served by other means. Russia in particular has many far-flung outposts in its eastern region that have had difficulty flourishing due to the financial constraints of building power plants so far away from everything else.

The Akademik Lomonosov will have two KLT-40 naval propulsion reactors modified to serve as power providers for an external location—with a displacement of 21,500 tons. Lomonosov noted that nuclear powered marine vessels have a proven safety record going back 50 years. Many nations now routinely deploy nuclear powered ships, submarines and even ice-breakers. He also stressed that the design of the vessel will be such that the platform will be capable of withstanding a tsunami or even a collision with land or a ship. The Akademik Lomonosov will not be able to power itself however, which means it will be towed to wherever it's needed. The vessel will be operated by a crew of 69 people and will also conform to regulations set by the International Atomic Energy Agency.


------------------------------------
It is just repurposing Nuclear Sub Reactors. The Russians probably could modify some of there Military Infrastructure to start pumping these out.
 
Last edited:

Accname

2D-Graphics enthusiast
Reaction score
1,462
Honestly, I have more faith in this ship then any reactor on the main land.
Because this ship is at higher risk there is much more attention and safety regulations.
 

camelCase

The Case of the Mysterious Camel.
Reaction score
362
Also, if shit happens, they could cool it down by just.. Dumping it in the water =)
 

The Helper

Necromancy Power over 9000
Staff member
Reaction score
1,697
Regardless of the risks I think this is an excellent idea and think it will raise the quality of life of many Russians.
 

FireCat

Oh Shi.. Don't wake the tiger!
Reaction score
535
It's too risky! Btw: Having a floating reactor> It will open "invitation to a terrorist attack"
Just saying.
 

The Helper

Necromancy Power over 9000
Staff member
Reaction score
1,697
It's too risky! Btw: Having a floating reactor> It will open "invitation to a terrorist attack"
Just saying.


Its modified Soviet Nuclear Submarine power supplies. They have been using those things for like 50 years. They have all the safety protocol for 50 years plus its in the water so overheat is not really a problem. I am sure they would have defenses but they are under no more risk of terrorist attack than a regular nuclear plant and if a region starts heating up they can just move it to a safer place.
 

FireCat

Oh Shi.. Don't wake the tiger!
Reaction score
535
Hmm What about "any extreme weather conditions?"
And not to mention, the nuclear plant could spill "waste" into the Sea!
 

KMilz

You can change this now in User CP.
Reaction score
142
Hmm What about "any extreme weather conditions?"
And not to mention, the nuclear plant could spill "waste" into the Sea!

Better than on land. You saw what happened at Chernobyl.
 

FireCat

Oh Shi.. Don't wake the tiger!
Reaction score
535
Better than on land. You saw what happened at Chernobyl.
Yes but they were able to dump cement on it. But if this nuclear sinks, you have no chance of that!
Hmm Russian roulette.
 

KMilz

You can change this now in User CP.
Reaction score
142
After it caused the worst nuclear accident in history. If it sinks, then we won't have to worry about a meltdown because it'll be drowned in water. Granted, the oceans probably wouldn't be feeling too hot, but I don't know how much radiation would be emitted from something like that or how quickly and completely it might disperse across the oceans of the world. Either way, I'd feel safer with it at sea than on land.
 

Accname

2D-Graphics enthusiast
Reaction score
1,462
The reactor is also within a very thick layer of submarine. It wont melt down because of all the water nearby. In case of emergency they can just sink it themselfs and cool the reactor down to stop any explosions.
 

KMilz

You can change this now in User CP.
Reaction score
142
The reactor is also within a very thick layer of submarine. It wont melt down because of all the water nearby. In case of emergency they can just sink it themselfs and cool the reactor down to stop any explosions.

Yeah, that's pretty much what I was getting at. Just unsure of whether or not it'd be leaking radiation into the water already prior to the controlled sink.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.

      The Helper Discord

      Members online

      No members online now.

      Affiliates

      Hive Workshop NUON Dome World Editor Tutorials

      Network Sponsors

      Apex Steel Pipe - Buys and sells Steel Pipe.
      Top