N
needshelpplz
Guest
Xd
"I only think they seem imbalanced to me on paper"
Ok, then try to balance them 'on paper'. (never really liked that saying)
"PotM doesn't have a morph;"
PotM has hide.
"Warden doesn't have a morph (she has a summon);"
Warden has hide (and a summon with various abilities).
"the Naga Sea Witch doesn't have a morph;"
Sea witch has submerge. Submerge is a morph.
"the Brewmaster has a morph."
Each with unique abilities.
"Does your hero have a morph? No; it can burrow into the ground."
Burrow is a morph.
"What categories are the judges judging? There's only one they are judging and it's called "Coding". The judges are not basing any score they give on what the spells do, what the tooltips are, how the hero fits his theme, how useful the hero is, or anything of that sort. They are simply reviewing the hero's code."
Why not extend the judges role so it doesn't become a complete popularity contest?
"I only think they seem imbalanced to me on paper"
Ok, then try to balance them 'on paper'. (never really liked that saying)
"PotM doesn't have a morph;"
PotM has hide.
"Warden doesn't have a morph (she has a summon);"
Warden has hide (and a summon with various abilities).
"the Naga Sea Witch doesn't have a morph;"
Sea witch has submerge. Submerge is a morph.
"the Brewmaster has a morph."
Each with unique abilities.
"Does your hero have a morph? No; it can burrow into the ground."
Burrow is a morph.
"What categories are the judges judging? There's only one they are judging and it's called "Coding". The judges are not basing any score they give on what the spells do, what the tooltips are, how the hero fits his theme, how useful the hero is, or anything of that sort. They are simply reviewing the hero's code."
Why not extend the judges role so it doesn't become a complete popularity contest?